Cash 4 Cars

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 28 July 2011

The FDIC Changes the Base for Deposit Insurance

Posted on 04:00 by Unknown
I confess that since the federal funds interest rate fell to near-zero in late 2008, I haven't paid much attention to it. But Todd Clark and John Lindner of the Cleveland Fed (pp. 5-7) offer a quick overview of some factors that have affected that rate since late 2010. In particular, they discuss a change I  probably should have known about, but had not: apparently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation no longer uses bank deposits as the base for deposit insurance premiums, but now uses the difference between bank assets and bank equity as the base for deposit insurance.

Clark and Lindner write: "Historically, the federal funds rate has been the primary instrument of monetary policy. Daily federal funds rates since November 2010 fall loosely into a series of three trends, all of which can at least be partially explained by an event that has influenced market participants. In November, the Fed announced the second round of large-scale asset purchases, which consisted of the Fed buying $600 billion in Treasury securities through the end of June 2011. From early November there was a steady decline in the federal funds rate from about 20 basis points to 17 basis points. The purchases increased the supply of reserves in the federal funds market, which pushed down the price, the federal funds rate. Put another way, the increased supply forced cash investors to compete in the market at lower interest rates."

"Similarly, the decision by the Treasury in early February 2011 to wind down its Supplemental Financing
Account balance inserted more reserves into the market for cash investors to place. Combined with the asset purchases, this move accelerated the decline in the federal funds rate. This acceleration was reflected in another 4 basis point decline, from 17 basis points to 13 basis points, over the following two months."

"By far the most studied of the three events, however, has been the change in the FDIC assessment base for deposit insurance. Many observers have argued that this is the move that caused the dramatic
drop in the federal funds rate at the beginning of April, and it has also been credited for holding the
eff ective rate at a fairly constant level of 10 basis points."

"With the new FDIC assessment policy, insured depository institutions will be charged an insurance premium not on their amount of deposits, but on the difference between their total assets and their equity. Broadly speaking, this equates to their liabilities, but there are some subtleties that we are going to skip over. Due to the change in the assessment base, depository institutions are now forced to pay an extra fee for any financed assets, including funds that they might borrow in the federal funds market. Since many of the funds available in the federal funds market are provided by nonbank institutions, the current primary purpose of borrowing these funds is to earn the interest on reserves (IOR) available at the Fed. So, banks are making the diff erence in the two rates (fed funds and IOR) as a profit. The new assessment implicitly increases the cost of the federal funds by adding that assessment rate onto the fed funds rate. As a result, some banks have exited the market, reducing overall demand for the funds dramatically. The fall in demand has reduced the funds rate."



Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in banking, deposit insurance | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • High Food Prices and Political Unrest
    Marco Lagi, Karla Z. Bertrand and Yaneer Bar-Yam of the New England Complex Systems Institute have a working paper up about "The Food C...
  • The Dispute over "Core Inflation"
    Is there a danger of inflation taking off? When the price of gasoline and food shoot through the roof, it seems like it. But central bank of...
  • Bruce Yandle on environmental economics
    David A. Price of the Richmond Fed has an interview with Bruce Yandle . On the difference between a “systems approach” and a “process approa...
  • Africa's Prospects: Half Full or Half Empty?
    There has been a flurry of articles recently with optimistic economic news about sub-Saharan Africa. For example, the December 3 issue of th...
  • Endorsing Association 3E: Ethics, Excellence, Economics
    I would like to take this opportunity to heartily endorse Association 3E: Ethics, Excellence, Economics. I discovered this organization last...
  • Spring 2011 Journal of Economic Perspectives On-line
    I'm the managing editor of the Journal of Economic Perspectives , published by the American Economic Association. It's an academic j...
  • Asian Century or Middle Income Trap?
    Will Asia come to dominate the global economy during the 21st century? The Asian Development Bank published a thoughtful report on the subje...
  • World Economic Forum Ranks U.S. Competitiveness
    The World Economic Forum is an independent organization that has been around since the early 1970s. It's perhaps best-known for the annu...
  • Sky-High Textbook Prices--And My Suggested Solution for Intro Economics
    High textbook prices are modest problem in the context of soaring costs of higher education, but many of the costs of tuition and room and b...
  • The Kuznets Curve and Inequality over the last 100 Years
    The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel first started being given in 1969, the backlog of worthy economis...

Categories

  • Africa
  • aging
  • agriculture
  • American dream
  • annuities
  • articles
  • banking
  • behavioral
  • biofuels
  • biomedical
  • brain science
  • budget deficits
  • capital flows
  • China
  • choice
  • cities
  • climate
  • column
  • convergence
  • credit rating agencies
  • crime
  • currency
  • debt
  • deficit
  • demand
  • demand and supply
  • deposit insurance
  • deregulation
  • development
  • disability insurance
  • drug policy
  • econometrics
  • economics in life
  • economists
  • education
  • employment
  • energy
  • environment
  • euro
  • Europe
  • exchange rates
  • exports
  • externalities
  • fdi
  • financial crisis
  • fiscal
  • fisfcal
  • food
  • food prices
  • free
  • game theory
  • gender
  • gender equality
  • genetics
  • geyser
  • globalization
  • gold
  • grades
  • Great Depression
  • Great Recession
  • growth
  • health
  • health care
  • higher education
  • history
  • households
  • housing
  • immigration
  • inequality
  • inflation
  • information
  • infrastructure
  • innovation
  • interest
  • international
  • international finance
  • international trade
  • interview
  • ipo
  • JEP
  • jobs
  • journals
  • Keynes
  • Krugman
  • labor
  • Labor Day
  • labor market
  • labor markets
  • long-term care
  • macro
  • macroeconomics
  • Medicare
  • microfinance
  • middle east
  • migration
  • minimum wage
  • monetary
  • monetary policy
  • moral hazard
  • Noriel Roubini
  • oil
  • olive oil
  • opportunity cost
  • payday loans
  • pension funds
  • policy evaluation
  • ponzi
  • population
  • postal service
  • poverty
  • price bubbles
  • price regulation
  • quotation
  • recovery
  • redistribution
  • regulation
  • resources
  • retirement
  • safety
  • Scrooge
  • social security
  • sociology
  • sunk costs
  • tax expenditures
  • tax policy
  • tax rates
  • taxes
  • teaching
  • teaching company
  • technology
  • textbooks
  • tourism
  • tradeoffs
  • transportation
  • unemployment
  • unions
  • usury
  • weak ties
  • WTO

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2011 (207)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (28)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ▼  July (28)
      • Thoughts on Immigration
      • The FDIC Changes the Base for Deposit Insurance
      • The IMF on the U.S. Economy #2: This Recovery in H...
      • The IMF on the U.S. Economy #1: What About the Bud...
      • Endorsing Association 3E: Ethics, Excellence, Econ...
      • The "American Dream"
      • Where Will America's Future Jobs Come From?
      • Will Emerging Economies Dominate the World Economy?
      • The Persuasive Power of Opportunity Costs
      • An Inequality Parade
      • Online Access and Academic Journals
      • How the U.S. Has Come Back to the Pack in Higher E...
      • Causes of Inequality: Supply and Demand for Skille...
      • Everybody Hates Biofuels
      • How high is U.S. income inequality?
      • The Severity of the Great Recession
      • Producing Safe Assets, Searching for Risky Opportu...
      • Lucas and Stokey on liquidity crises
      • Inbound Foreign Direct Investment in the U.S.
      • The Thin Line Between "Fees" and "Interest"
      • In the Recovery: Men Gaining Jobs, Women Losing Jobs
      • Banerjee and Duflo on microcredit and repayment
      • Could Restrictions on Payday Lending Hurt Consumers?
      • 2010 Years of economic output and population in on...
      • Who Gets Jobs and Wages from the iPod?
      • The Decade-Long Rise in Teen Summer Unemployment
      • Economic Geyser: Must Be a Metaphor Here Somewhere!
      • The Accumulation of Regulations
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (9)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile